Driver wearing a SmartCap developed by CRCMining

Thinking caps save drowsy drivers

Studies show the risk of driving tired is equal to driving under the influence of alcohol, but until recently there was no reliable way to measure driver drowsiness. In the mining industry one quarter of all fatalities are attributed to vehicles; two-thirds are single-vehicle incidents in which fatigue may play a role.

In his 2007 research paper on driver fatigue, Mark Symmons of Monash University in Victoria found that truck drivers were more prone to having a fatigue-related fatality than car drivers. He estimates fatigue was a factor in about six per cent of Victorian accidents, although the severity was greater due to higher average speeds, the inability of the driver to take corrective action before the accident and the increased risk of head-on collision. Symmons attributes about a quarter of fatalities on Victorian roads to fatigue.

The difficulty in preventing this tragedy stems from the inability to gauge driver fatigue on the road.

“There are no on-road objective mechanisms for its detection – no tool that acts in a similar manner to speed cameras (or) breath tests,” Symmons writes. A police officer taking witness statements at the scene of an accident is reliant on subjective measures of its cause that may be inaccurate.

Work done at Australia’s Cooperative Research Centre for Mining (CRCMining) aims to solve these problems by providing, for the first time, empirical evidence of driver fatigue on the road much the same way as a speedometer determines a car’s velocity.

One of the results is SmartCap –a wearable biofeedback device sewn into the lining of a baseball cap that captures brain waves and, through a brim device, wirelessly relays data to a display in the cab of the vehicle to measure a driver’s mental fatigue. A reading from one to five allows an operator to tell at a glance if they are alert or close to dozing off. When the device registers that the driver is about to snooze, it sounds a local alarm while serious fatigue levels are sent back to base for management intervention. This could mean advising the driver to take a 15-minute “power nap”, check in for a cup of coffee at a crew shack or rotate off the equipment they’re operating.

Unlike existing brainwave monitoring technologies, SmartCap doesn’t require the driver to shave their hair, it’s washable, rugged and interchangeable, says SmartCap inventor and project leader, Dr Dan Bongers, Chief Technology Officer of CRCMining spin-off, EdanSafe.

The idea for SmartCap began while Bongers – who has degrees in space and mechanical engineering and an MBA from Queensland University – was working on his doctorate, developing artificial intelligence systems to detect machine faults in underground mines, sponsored by CRCMining.

He says a CRC industry member was frustrated that they had tried every fatigue-management technology with the intention of integrating one into their product line of mining trucks but none worked.

“These products were enticing but they didn’t measure fatigue properly and were not suited for the mining industry.”

Previous systems claiming to measure fatigue often fell back on simple interpretations of eye-blinking frequencies.

“Everyone is different – some people blink faster than other people for no other reason than because that’s how they blink – the person to person variation was universally identified as a fundamental flaw of these tools,” he says. “There needed to be a way of truly capturing a universal relationship, which is never as trivial as saying ‘if you blink slower than this you’re tired’.”

Bongers worked weekends downloading brainwave patterns from the internet and playing with neural networks before he cracked the code to measure a person’s fatigue levels non-invasively and accurately.

Even then, he says, he wasn’t sure it was a marketable product. It took eight years of studies and commercialisation trials to get SmartCap ready for sale.

Bongers’ pioneering work was recently recognised with a Public Safety Innovation Award at the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials Australasia conference.

“It’s an acknowledgement that good solutions to real problems [are] a genuine step forward in safety and not something that’s just cool to buy.”

The commercial future

Bongers estimates there is a market for SmartCap in up to 2700 mining trucks in Australia. But to get from drawing board to marketplace, EdanSafe had to team up with British multinational miner Anglo American to test the system and seek independent evaluation to prove their results correlated.

Hans Hayes, General Manager of Opencut Mining Excellence at Anglo American Metallurgical Coal in Brisbane, says he was drawn to the project through funding provided by the Australian Coal Association Research Programme.

Anglo American provided two test sites and A$2 million during the product trials. The company now wants to implement SmartCap in its own international operations and offer it to miners and vertical industries around the globe.

Drivers of slow, heavy machines such as haulpaks (“dump trucks”) that may weigh up to 500 tonnes under load are at most risk, Hayes says.

“SmartCap is not a disciplinary system,” he says. “It’s about helping the person manage their fatigue levels.”

Operators of mining equipment are especially susceptible to fatigue because their shift lengths are generally longer than in other industries, Australian Government figures show.

Since 2005, more than 50 drivers have died on mine sites, according to March figures from the Compendium Of Workers’ Compensation Statistics published by Safework Australia, a Government statutory body that seeks to improve work health and safety.

And while the frequency of such accidents in the mining industry has halved over the past seven years, it still records the highest median payouts for accidents that result in injury or fatality (A$16,300) while time lost, with the exception of coal mining, is still climbing.

Australia-wide in the period, 438 fatalities were recorded – two-thirds in single-vehicle accidents where fatigue may have played a role.

But before SmartCap would be accepted, developers had to assuage mine workers’ fear that their minds were being read.

“People don’t like their brainwaves being taken away and stored because the right person looking at them can make certain inferences,” Bongers says.

“All fatigue calculations including recording brainwaves, converting into a digital signal and processing into a fatigue calculation has to happen on the individual in the removable fatigue processor card.

“The only information that’s transmitted wirelessly by Bluetooth is a fatigue level and other monotonous diagnostic information.”

The drivers influenced the process of implementing the hat and what happens in the cab of the vehicle, says Anglo American’s Hayes.

“Initially, the system was going to be a hat with an inbuilt sensor in the cap that each person had to put on when they started the shift and then at the end of the shift put in a cleaning solution for the next person but that was going to be too complicated,” Hayes says.

“Now, each person gets their own personal cap and all there is, is a small chip that gets charged up in the permanent unit. They take it out and put in the receptacle in their hat that they put in under the brim and that gives them two to three hours of signal and there are three chips and as they’re using one the others are charging up.

And it’s not just on the job where mine-site drivers are at risk – Government studies show the mining industry records the highest rate of fatalities for workers getting to and from work.

Anglo American is considering giving SmartCap to its drivers as they leave mine sites to help them get home safely.

Once the miner is satisfied the product is fit for purpose, it will open it up to other companies around the world.

“We’re allowing other mining companies to trial the product now and companies in heavy haulage and the rail industry – we’ve even had queries from the air force and navy.”

Anglo American is trialling a portable unit for commercial taxi fleets that plugs into the 12-volt power outlets in cars.

Hayes sees potential benefits to civil aviation and public transport and even for deep-sea divers and astronauts. The SmartCap technology might even benefit professional sports players.

“We also see potential to use the hat to evaluate roster systems or shift lengths,” Hayes says. “This is the first chance we’ve got to get factual data rather than some independent fatigue specialist giving an estimate of people’s health.”

Future models may come in the form of a headband – especially for women or those who don’t want to wear a cap – and a baseball cap that is worn backwards (at present, the sensors are only in the front of the cap so don’t touch the appropriate parts of the head when worn this way).

Looking to the future

CRCMining Chief Executive Officer, Paul Lever, says technologies such as SmartCap will ensure the group’s future. CRCMining, now in a “transitional” phase with its last round of public funding behind it, has to prove it can stand on its own two feet within two years.

“The mining technology services business is a large, important exporter for Australia,” Lever says. “It has potential to grow considerably larger than it is at the moment and be a sustainable business into the future – it would make sense for government to continue to support and nurture this industry.”

The CRCMining model is a beacon to other countries looking to lift their research output, he says, but future funding will come from its intellectual property, he says.

Author: Nate Cochrane
Originally published on the Australia Unlimited website

Economic, Social and Environmental Impacts of the Cooperative Research Centres Program

Report by the Allen Consulting Group to the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education

September 2012

This study estimates the economic, environmental and social impacts of the Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) program since it commenced in 1991 and out to 2017. Nearly 120 past and present CRCs have contributed to the study. Between 1991 and 2017 CRCs produced technologies, products and processes that were estimated to have a direct value of almost $14.5 billion.

Adobe PDF fileDownload the Allen Consulting Group report (6.6 Mb)

Submission to the Green Paper to inform development of a National Food Plan

The purpose of this submission is to recommend that the Australian Government’s successful and enduring Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) model is an appropriate economy-wide institutional form for initiating, managing and delivering collaborative research under the National Food Plan.

This submission:

  1. Examines the implied strategic approach for Australian Government future investment in innovation, research and delivery under the National Food Plan – drawing on statements in the Green Paper and the contemporaneous Rural Research and Development Policy Statement;
  2. Aligns the challenges in implementing this strategic approach with the unique characteristics and successful track record of CRCs; and
  3. Assesses the potential for the CRC model to deliver the Green Paper’s stated objective of increasing public investment and attracting private investment to cross-sector R&D, directed to productivity improvement and value adding in the food industry.

Adobe PDF fileCRCA Submission to National Food Plan Green Paper

Slope Stability Radar

Safer mining with Slope Stability Radar by GroundProbe Pty Ltd

Employees: 165
Revenue: $44 million (2010)
Operating in: Australia, Brazil, Chile, Indonesia, South Africa, United States
Products: Slope Stability Radar (SSR), Work Area Monitor (WAM)
Key people: Lyle Bruce (CEO), David Noon (Chief Commercial Officer)

GroundProbe markets technologies that improve safety in the mining industry globally. Formed in 2001 as a spin-off company from CSSIP, the CRC for Sensor Signal and Information Processing (1991-2006), the company’s main product is the Slope Stability Radar (SSR), a device that monitors the stability of rock walls in open-cut mines.

The SSR project started in 1997 as CSSIP project funded by the CRC and the Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) and supported by CRCMining. The initial results were very promising with the radar system able to detect even very slight rock movement on the slope walls from a safe remote distance.  However, it took more than six years of R&D work to bring this technology from the promise of safer mining to a point where it could be commercialised.

GroundProbe’s Chief Commercial Officer David Noon, one of the inventors of the SSR, has been with the company since its inception. David,  a product of the CRC Program, exemplifies the superior educational benefits that the CRC system provides.  CSSIP funded David’s doctoral research at the University of Queensland.  His PhD thesis topic was on a different radar technology, ground penetrating radar (GPR) for application in continuous surface mining.  The CRC provided David with the opportunity to interact with mining industry executives during the period of his doctoral research studies.  It also allowed him to take courses on commercialisation and to work with professionals to protect the intellectual property (IP) that the Centre developed.

Although David’s GPR project was a technical success it was clear at the conclusion of his thesis that SSR, a technology that was being developed with another student, was far more likely to lead to commercial success – a key driver for CSSIP.  The CRC established GroundProbe to commercialise SSR.  Its success has been phenomenal from the first sales of about $1 million in 2003 to $44 million in 2010 – a compound annual growth rate of more than 70%!  The company now operates in every significant mining country around the globe.

David says the CRC provided not only the means to seek external funding and industry contacts, but fostered an esprit de corps amongst researchers which greatly increased the research team’s capability.

“The end-user focus of the CRC Program helped us to identify a problem of critical importance to the mining industry and allowed us to introduce to this industry technologies that had been developed for other applications – in this case radar systems used by the military” David says. “It is one thing to come up with a solution, but another to discover how to implement and package it.”

Building a successful company around a genuinely new technology is difficult.  GroundProbe began by making several key decisions that provided the essential platform for its later success.  First, it persuaded all of the stakeholders to transfer all of the relevant IP into the company – having clear title to all of the IP that is being commercialised is an absolute requirement for any new company.  Second, it appointed a board with considerable experience in the mining industry, including appointing Nick Stump (former CEO of MIM Holdings) as chairman.  Third, the board appointed an outside experienced entrepreneur, Lyle Bruce, as its inaugural CEO.  Fourth, they key researchers, including David Noon, left their university appointments and join the company as employees.  Fifth, these key researchers were given equity in the company.

Chief Executive Officer Lyle Bruce joined the company in June 2003, and he played a key role in building up the commercial business. He also noted the important role the CRC played in establishing GroundProbe.

“At the time the technology was very immature,” Lyle says. “No other organisation would have been willing to fund the research, simply because it was unique to the mining industry, and not proven.”

“The CRC was willing to fund the research, and was able to bring in a number of partners and expertise that we would not have been able to access otherwise.”

“The turning point came at an international slope stability conference in 2005 where the majority of papers presented were on radar technologies. It was then, eight years after the research first started, that we knew the technology was the accepted method.”

Nearly ten years on since its establishment, Lyle says the company – and the technology – is flourishing.  The company has grown from a team of four to more than 165 employees in seven countries. The company has made a profit every year since it was established and 2010 had revenues of $44 million. The SSR has been recognised as a game changer for the industry.

“We’ve completely transformed the way that open-cut mining operations do their day to day business.”

“Previously companies had to use a wire extensometer (a tool that used long wires to measure displacement between two areas) and now they can deploy our radar on the back of a vehicle, simply point it at the slope and start monitoring”.

“We often have to keep a close eye on who trials our radar and for how long, because once we send it to a site, we tend to not get it back! It becomes such an essential tool for the safety of their personnel that they can’t operate without it.”

Lyle recalls a particular trial at a mine in Western Australia after an operator had died due to a collapsed haul road.

“The drivers had absolutely no confidence in the road system” Lyle says. “They were also extremely sceptical about our technology.”

The team took the radar to the mine and showed the operators where another portion of the wall would collapse overnight, and even went so far as to mark the area with traffic cones.

“When the morning rolled around the slope had collapsed exactly as predicted,” Lyle says. “The operators turned up to see a line of traffic cones next to a collapsed wall.”

“We then said that we could have our radar monitoring the slopes 24/7, and they immediately went back to work!”

Adobe PDF fileGroundProbe Pty Ltd

PhD student saves Australian water authorities $90 million a year on pipe maintenance

And wins the 2012 CSIRO Cooperative Research Centres’ Award for early career researchers

A young PhD student has won the CSIRO-sponsored speakers’ award for early career researchers for his presentation at the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) Association’s annual conference in Adelaide.

Fengfeng Li, a Queensland University of Technology student with the CRC for Infrastructure and Engineering Asset Management (CIEAM), has been working to solve the high-cost problem of maintaining Australia’s ageing water pipes, something that has cost Australia’s water authorities an estimated $10 billion dollars over the last 20 years.

“The costs come through extended loss of water supply, water contamination, massive losses of water, and high costs of repair,” Mr Li said. “There are also safety issues with bursting water pipes including the case this year when a young mother died after falling into a burst hot water pipe below a footpath in Beijing.”

Mr Li’s research used sophisticated computer modeling to take into account the equipment needed to maintain pipes, the location of the pipes and the best time to schedule work so it will not disrupt the local community, but still avoid pipes bursting unexpectedly.

Based on historical data, he can also predict which pipes are most likely to fail and the most efficient way to schedule repair works.

“All over the country, in cities especially, pipelines in water distribution systems are ageing and the likelihood of failing is increasing,” says Mr Li. “Most pipelines tend to be hidden underground. They aren’t laid out in neat grids, they’re hard to access, they’re of different ages and construction, they can cross local council borders, and maintenance services often means interruptions for customers.

“It’s essential that water pipelines can be maintained effectively at the lowest cost possible. But it’s difficult to get the best outcomes through traditional maintenance planning, especially when this planning depends so much on individual planners.”

Professor Lin Ma, Li’s PhD supervisor is impressed with his research: “Li has independently developed the optimisation model for this complex problem,” she said. “It’s ground breaking research.”

Fengfeng Li spoke at the CRCA conference yesterday with 5 other CRC early career researchers who were selected on a competitive basis to speak at the conference. About 40 students applied to present at the conference. The audience voted electronically on the speaker they thought gave the best overall presentation and had the best content.

As the winner, Fengfeng wins $1500 which was awarded at the CRCA Conference last night at the National Wine Centre in Adelaide by Australia’s Chief Scientist, Professor Ian Chubb.

ENDS


Further information/interview:
Fengfeng Li, phone 0431 208 363
Susan Lambe, Communication and Marketing, CRC for Infrastructure and Engineering Asset Management (CIEAM) Phone: 07 3138 1164 or 0413 606 583

For media assistance and photos:
Jenni Metcalfe,
0408 551 866, jenni@econnect.com.au

Event hashtag: #collab_innovate

 

Adobe PDF filePhD student saves Australian water authorities millions

Rocky road for faster trains

Anyone who has travelled on trains in Europe or Japan rocketing along in silence and comfort wonders why Australian trains continue to trundle at 1940s speeds.

It’s not the train or even the lines, but the rocky foundations (or ballast) on which the rails are laid, and results in strict speed limits for trains.

The problem is these fist-sized rocks move when trains pass over them. It’s a grinding motion which causes the ballast to spread out and disintegrate. This makes the lines unstable and in severe examples can lead to derailments.

In NSW alone, maintaining the ballast is a $15 million annual cost.

Khaja Syed from the University of Wollongong says that about ten years ago engineers identified a solution. This was to place a plastic mesh (‘geogrid’) underneath the rocks to hold the ballast in place.

“Now we are refining and improving this process,” he says. “My work is testing the best place to place the mesh, and the best size of the holes in the mesh.”

Putting the right type of plastic mesh reinforcement within the rocks, and in the right place, can dramatically increase railway safety and reduce costs.

“Currently, the average speed of freight trains in Australia is about 80 kilometres per hour. Normal rail track can’t cater for speeds approaching 200 kilometres per hour, which Australia needs for high-speed, heavy freight trains,” says Mr Syed.

There are many types of geogrids available, and each state has different requirements for the ballast used in their railways. “We need to know what the best geogrid is for each location and each type of ballast,” says Mr Syed.

Previous research only took one measure of how much the ballast sideways moved under load, but Mr Syed developed an innovative apparatus to measure sideways spread through all layers of the ballast.

His research is supervised by Professor Buddhima Indraratna, an internationally renowned expert in rail track technology.

“By upgrading to high-speed freight trains, we can improve the efficiency of transport for sectors such as agriculture and mining,” says Prof. Indraratna. “That also makes transport more resilient and cheaper in the future.”

“Everywhere else in the world people talk about speeds exceeding 300 kilometres per hour when they talk about high-speed rail, but our current maximum speeds are just over 150 kilometres per hour.”

Prof. Indraratna’s team, of which Mr Syed is a part, are some of the only researchers in Australia looking at high-speed rail tracks instead of just super-charged engines or locomotives.

“We need this research,” he says. “It’s like having the fastest Porsche without the road to run it on.”

Mr Syed is researching for the Cooperative Research Centre for Rail Innovation (Rail CRC) through the University of Wollongong.

He is taking part in the Showcasing Early Career Researchers conference session at the Cooperative Research Centres Association (CRCA) conference, Collaborate | Innovate | 2012. Mr Syed will present his research and be eligible to win a prize of $1,500 from the CRC Association at the Awards Dinner.

He will speak at Plenary Session 3 on Wednesday 16 May 8:30–10:30am following addresses by Senator The Hon. Chris Evans, Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research and Simon McKeon , 2011 Australian of the Year.

Get more information about the conference online: www.crca.asn.au/conference/

ENDS


For interview and/or photos:

Khaja Syed, University of Wollongong, 02 4239 2356 or 0421 823 475, email kkhs545@uowmail.edu.au

Professor Buddhima Indraratna, University of Wollongong, 02 4221 3046 or 0400 213 046, email indra@uow.edu.au

For media assistance:

Jenni Metcalfe, Econnect Communication, mobile: 0408 551 866, email jenni@econnect.com.au

Adobe PDF fileRocky road for faster trains

‘Green steel’ from old rubber tyres produces no waste or toxic fumes

The ‘impossible’ achieved through deep collaboration between Centre for Sustainable Materials Research & Technology and OneSteel

The seemingly impossible dream of producing steel with the help of recycled materials such as old rubber tyres and plastics is now a reality thanks to close researcher-industry collaboration.

University of New South Wales researchers and OneSteel Ltd collaborated through the Centre for Sustainable Materials Research and Technology (SMaRT) to achieve the breakthrough, which replaces a significant proportion of the coke normally used in EAF steel-making with recycled tyres or plastics that are rich in carbon.

“The really exciting side benefit was that the recycled scrap rubber or plastic material produced a more stable foamy slag compared to using coke only,” says Professor Veena Sahajwalla, Director of SMaRT at the UNSW. “This greatly improves the steel furnace’s energy efficiency.”

The technology has been successfully incorporated into OneSteel’s commercial furnaces over the past four years and is now standard practice at two of its Australian operations.

The process, called Polymer Injection Technology has been patented internationally and has been commercialised for international steel makers using Electric Arc Furnaces (EAF), responsible for 40 percent of the world’s steel production. The first commercial implementation of the technology took place in Thailand in 2011.

Professor Sahajwalla hypothesised that if recycled rubber or plastic was subjected to rapid and very high temperatures it would change into the carbon material that joins with molten iron to make up steel along with clean gases such as hydrogen and carbon monoxide.

She successfully tested this in her UNSW lab by injecting the rubber/plastic into a mini EAF using the same processes by which coke is injected.

“While this research was groundbreaking, it would likely have just ended up in journal papers if it hadn’t have been for our collaboration with OneSteel,” Professor Sahajwalla says.

“Not only did this collaboration provide access to industrial-scale furnaces essential to proving the real-world viability of the process, but OneSteel as experts in technical and commercial steelmaking took an active role in improving the process over hundreds of test melts.”

During the collaboration, many SMaRT centre students worked within OneSteel’s facilities resulting in some joining the company during and after the collaboration, and bringing young engineers into an industry that can struggle to attract top talent.

As of March 2012, the technology has replaced almost 15,000 tonnes of coal with more than one million car tyres (or their equivalents). This has reduced many millions of KWh hours of energy each year while increasing furnace productivity and producing more steel from the same amount of ferrous scrap.

The Polymer Injection Technology Technology won a 2012 Collaborative Innovation Award tonight at the Cooperative Research Centres Association conference in Adelaide.

For interview: Scientia Professor Veena Sahajwalla, UNSW, phone 0400 490 479; 02 9385 4426 or Darren O’Connell, Strategic Marketing Manager, OneSteel on 0418 602 921

For media assistance and photos: Jenni Metcalfe, 0408 551 866, jenni@econnect.com.au

Adobe PDF fileGreen steel from old rubber tyres

Australian solar cell technology breaks the 20% barrier

Aussie researchers team with Suntech to develop Pluto Technology

World-class Australian solar research has produced new photovoltaic solar cells that recently broke the 20% barrier for conversion efficiency in capturing the sun’s energy, the highest ever efficiency for a low-cost, commercial silicon solar cell.

Suntech’s Pluto solar cell production capacity reached 0.5 gigawatts last year. That is enough to power 300,000 average homes that typically have eight solar panels on them for at least 25 years.

Pluto technology, as it is patented, was developed by Professors Martin Green and Stuart Wenham at the ARC Photovoltaics Centre for Excellence in close collaboration with the world’s largest solar cell manufacturer, Suntech.

“We recently broke through the 20 per cent conversion efficiency target for solar cells using solar-grade silicon, which many experts thought was impossible, and we’ve significantly lowered the costs compared to other technologies,” says Professor Green from the University of New South Wales.

Professor Green believes this success was earned through deep collaboration with US-listed company Suntech: “We brought our photovoltaic knowhow together with their manufacturing expertise and developed new tools and processes to produce solar cells ten times the size of our lab-scale devices.”

Suntech’s expertise was particularly important in lowering the production cost of the solar cells. For example, Suntech developed cheaper processing methods that allowed the substitution of expensive silver and titanium materials used in the production of conventional crystalline-silicon solar cells.

“Without this collaboration and its funding through the Australian Solar Institute, Pluto would have remained a lab prototype rather than a commercial reality,” says Professor Wenham. “As we continue to refine the Pluto technology and push up the conversion efficiency, we have no doubt that it will capture an increasing share of the global solar market.”

International studies predict that the present $100 billion/year photovoltaic industry will grow to well in excess of a $trillion/year as it becomes the major supplier of the world’s electrical energy needs.

“While many photovoltaic researchers around the world are focused on the holy grail of higher and higher efficiencies, we believe Pluto technology has struck the ideal balance between conversion efficiency and manufacturing costs to create a truly viable alternative for electricity production,” says Professor Green.

The Pluto Technology won a 2012 Collaborative Innovation Award tonight at the Cooperative Research Centres Association conference in Adelaide.

For interview: Professor Stuart Wenham, UNSW, phone 0411 492 417; Professor Martin Green, UNSW, phone 0411 492 416

For media assistance: Jenni Metcalfe, 0408 551 866, jenni@econnect.com.au

About Suntech

Suntech Power Holdings Co., Ltd. (NYSE: STP) produces industry-leading solar products for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility applications. With regional headquarters in China, Switzerland, and the United States, and gigawatt-scale manufacturing worldwide, Suntech has delivered more than 25,000,000 photovoltaic panels to over a thousand customers in more than 80 countries. Suntech’s pioneering R&D creates customer-centric innovations that are driving solar to grid parity against fossil fuels. Suntech’s mission is to provide everyone with reliable access to nature’s cleanest and most abundant energy source.

For more information about Suntech’s people and products visit http://www.suntech-power.com

Adobe PDF fileAustralian solar cell technology breaks the 20% barrier

Leaky rusty water pipes pose million-dollar problem for water authorities

Australia’s water mains are getting older, and bursting or leaking water pipes are costing business and local residents millions of dollars, but many of these dollars could be saved thanks to some clever computer modeling by a PhD researcher.

The costs come through extended loss of service supply, water contamination, massive losses of water, and high costs of repair.

Through pioneering research, Queensland University of Technology engineering PhD candidate Fengfeng Li has developed an innovative decision support tool that can help reduce the risks and costs associated with the renewal of pipelines.

It takes into account the equipment needed, the location of the pipes and the best time to schedule work so it will not disrupt the local community. He can also predict which pipes are most likely to fail and the most efficient way to schedule repair works.

Called the Replacement Decision Optimisation Model for Group Scheduling, the tool also has the potential to be applied to other linear assets such as railways and power transmission lines.

“All over the country, in cities especially, pipelines in water distribution systems are ageing and the likelihood of failing is increasing,” says Mr Li.

“Most pipelines tend to be hidden underground. They aren’t laid out in neat grids, they’re hard to access, they’re of different ages and construction, they can cross jurisdictional borders, and maintenance service often means interruptions for customers.

“It’s essential that water pipelines can be maintained effectively at the lowest cost possible. But it’s difficult to get the best outcomes through traditional maintenance planning, especially when this planning depends so much on individual planners,” says Li.

The new model schedules pipeline maintenance not on an individual pipe or needs-must basis. Maintenance is proactively scheduled based on the application of an algorithm that optimises groupings.

The novel classification system for pipeline maintenance scheduling was developed in collaboration with industry partners.

Professor Lin Ma, Li’s PhD supervisor is impressed with his research:

“Li has independently developed the optimisation model for this complex problem,” she said. “It’s ground breaking research.”

“Modern water utilities are under a great deal of pressure to squeeze every cent of value out of the maintenance and management of their pipeline networks. Li’s model can help them to reduce the cost of operation and price to consumers without compromising the quality of service and reliability.”

Fengfeng Li will be speaking at the annual conference of the Cooperative Research Centres Association —‘Collaborate | Innovate |2012’—, National Wine Centre of Australia in Adelaide on 15–17 May.

He will speak at Plenary Session 3 on Wednesday 16 May 8:30–10:30am following addresses by Senator The Hon. Chris Evans, Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research and Simon McKeon , 2011 Australian of the Year.

Further information/interview:

Fengfeng Li, phone 0431 208 363

Susan Lambe, Communication and Marketing, CRC for Integrated Engineering and Asset Management (CIEAM) Phone: 07 3138 1164 or 0413 606 583

For media assistance: Jenni Metcalfe, 0408 551 866, jenni@econnect.com.au

Adobe PDF fileLeaky rusty water pipes media release

Some kids can hear but don’t listen

A significant number of children aged 6 to 18 can ‘hear’ everything that’s said in a noisy environment, but they have trouble taking it in.

It’s a problem which causes great concern to parents and teachers, and may affect up to one child in every classroom. Although these difficulties are commonly referred to as Auditory Processing Disorders (APD), the condition has never been properly understood.

Now new research is beginning to unlock the secrets of APD and take the first steps towards a treatment.

Researcher Pia Gyldenkaerne from The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre tested a group of children aged 7–12 diagnosed with APD.

“In a noisy classroom, children with APD can find it hard to comprehend the teacher’s instructions. This may result in the children switching off and appearing inattentive. Their language and learning development and, in the long term, their academic performance can be affected.”

She measured their responses to sounds and to visual stimuli, recording their electrical and magnetic brain responses.

“Compared with other children in the control group, I found that different parts of their brains responded,” she says. “These children can hear perfectly well and they want to learn, but they think and respond in a different way.”

Ms Gyldenkaerne says that the children’s listening skills in background noise were improved if they can see a complementing visual image.

“Lip-reading seems to help. In the clinic I advise teachers to place themselves so that students with APD can see their lips,” she says. “The additional clues they pick up from lip-reading reinforces what they hear, and helps them understand the instructions.”

Pia will discuss her research at the annual conference of the Cooperative Research Centres Association —‘Collaborate | Innovate |2012’—being held at the National Wine Centre of Australia in Adelaide on 15–17 May.

She will speak at Plenary Session 3 on Wednesday 16 May 8:30–10:30am following addresses by Senator The Hon. Chris Evans, Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research and Simon McKeon, 2011 Australian of the Year.

For interview:

Pia Gyldenkaerne, m: 0409 185 764, pia.gyldenkaerne@mq.edu.au

Images: photos of a brain scan and Pia working are available

Media assistance:

Jenni Metcalfe, Econnect Communication, m: 0408 551 866, jenni@econnect.com.au

CRCA conference: www.crca.asn.au/conference/

Adobe PDF fileSome kids can hear but don’t listen